Not all laws of the nature are subject to Bolsheviks

Peter SILKO

I already for a long time from mass media heard, that in Belarus want to build an atomic power station (APS), but did not give to this great value. Thought supposedly will talk to itself, will talk, yes on it all and will be terminated. Unless is it possible for our press to trust? Certainly, it is impossible. The lie and insinuations is its hobby-horse. In fact after everything, that has taken place on April, 26, 1986 in Chernobyl, only the lunatic can speak about construction of an atomic power station in Belarus. In fact Belarus has suffered not less Ukraine in which territory it is located the Chernobyl’s APS. And here speak about own station... And it appears that was necessary to believe …. Now as to the expert in the field of atomic engineering it is painfully hurt to me to hear, how officials talk profusely about an economic gain of such action. It is possible to speak about what economic gain? This same what to speak about utility of occurrence of epidemics for enrichment of grave diggers. If our officials though a droplet are statesmen they should understand that the problem of construction of the atomic power station is enough a difficult complex problem which cannot be squeezed in economic and accounting calculations. What to not be proofless, let's consider the basic aspects such "usual", according to officials, action. What has been constructed in Chernobyl, what so "has glorified" this small Ukrainian town for the whole world? A basis of fourth block of the Chernobyl’s APS is the Russian (Soviet) reactor of big power of channel type, so-called RBPC. In due time this reactor was presented as last achievement of the Soviet science, and the ending of construction of 4-th block Chernobyl’s APS has been dated for the next congress of the CPSU. That the design of the atomic power station with reactors of such type from the scientific point of view was flaw design already is an indisputable fact. Though the governmental commission, which examined the reasons of failure, has written off all on mistakes of technicians. At us in fact already for a long time has become a tradition, that always the switchman is guilty. I witness that else before failure on the Chernobyl’s APS nowadays late academician Krasin, director of former Institute of nuclear power (Belarus), specified essential lacks of the atomic power station with reactors of channel type, is especial in the field of nuclear safety. One of ways of increase of a level of safety of such station already at that time experts were offered to use a special cap which in case of failure would interfere with emission of radioactive substances in an environment. Certainly, this cap could not prevent failure but if it was on the Chernobyl’s APS Belarus on the order would suffer from failure less. And in fact project of the Chernobyl’s APS was carefully examined by the various commissions at all levels and only then has been authorized to construction. It is asked, whether there is a guarantee of that already to us (Belarus) will not offer next "masterpiece" of reactor technics. All reasonings on carrying out of competition at the choice of type of a nuclear reactor do not worth a hill of beans. Whose will be used nuclear fuel on the Belarusian atomic power station and who will take away the fulfilled fuel back that and will define type of nuclear power installation. And in this plan is unequivocal, that if in Belarus the atomic power station it will be station on the basis of Russian PWR project (a water-water power reactor) will be under construction. Though operating experience of nuclear stations on the basis of these reactors has shown higher reliability of their work in comparison with other atomic power stations, there are no guarantees of that as at use of PWR there will be no large failures. As practically all existing PWR projects are a level of scientific researches of the seventieth - the eightieth years of the last century. This level is characterized by that for these reactors those years the full complex of researches of all questions connected with nuclear safety has not been carried out. To some extent it was because of absence at that time very powerful computer technics necessary for such researches. And basically it was result of the scientific policy spent those years, policy obviously erroneous and irresponsible as in it was not given sufficient attention to questions of nuclear safety which researches demanded huge financial expenses. It is doubtful, that within last two decades such researches were carried out in general or have been carried out up to the end. And if to take into account, that after failure on the Chernobyl’s APS practically all scientific researches in this direction have been frozen, it is possible to tell with the big confidence, that the full complex of researches on nuclear safety of these atomic power stations and has not been carried out. Even if and to admit, that design of Russian PWR is enough reliable already at operation of nuclear station the essential role is played with the subjective factor. It is impossible to suppose, that calmness and lives of huge quantity of people were hostages of one or several persons as it was on the Chernobyl’s APS. To solve this problem it is practically impossible. And if thus to take into account and threats of the international terrorism unsolvability of this problem becomes even more menacing. Huge lack of all nuclear power of the whole is presence of the open-ended fuel cycle. To develop the electric power on the atomic power station for the sake of reception of the momentary blessings and gradually to transform our ground into a killing burial ground with the fulfilled nuclear fuel is immoral. In essence we, already existing now, power task already existing now shift on shoulders of the future generations, leaving thus it in the inheritance the most complicated non-authorized problems. It is necessary to search new, more safe, energy sources already now. And nuclear power as the science, does not suffer the Bolshevism as a method of scientific researches. The nature gives people only that it can give. And to impose to it the will and to demand from it the greater - it is fraught with bad consequences. It was shown also by Chernobyl. And again to repeat already made mistakes is simply a crime.

Up to new meetings in the Internet, dear readers!

Advice to you yes Love …

Tatiana SAMSONOVA

(Belarus, Minsk) Competition

There are the women capable to big fulfilments. The world knows many examples of outstanding women which the activity have surpassed many men … One of the most important fulfilments of wives will be, they bring what contribution in a life and activity of the husbands. Here the statement is pertinent: «Behind of the majority of great men great wives stand». Men and women, marrying, restore the initial spiritual and physical unity and form together a complete essence - the person. Incorporating in a marriage, the husband and the wife are "opposite" each other, and the child given birth by them embodies initial unity of the man and the woman. «Only the husband and the wife together form the validity of the person; the husband and the wife together is life of a sort for their union is a source of set, a source of other people».

The interesting idea was stated concerning an ideal marriage by the American writer A.Bierce: «The marriage is the community consisting of mister, madam and two slaves, an aggregate number in two persons». It was both taken together, the man and the woman, became that the God has named a great word the Person. All this speaks that in the plan Divine neither men have no the right to ignore women, nor women - men. Each of the sides in itself is incompleteness. Therefore we shall not neglect the friend the friend how our husbands and wives were imperfect. In a marriage the woman is equal to the husband everything, but in the functions she is obliged to submit to the husband easy, but willingly and of own will. It creates harmony in family, in a society, in the universe. Only when the husband and the wife together and their mutual relations are spiritualized by one idea, they create a single whole - a married couple. The couple is not the sum of two separate essences, this formation of new indissoluble unity. They one flesh and one spirit, and under the plan Divine should live in full harmony with each other. The union of them is based on obedience both mutual love and respect. In all centuries in family and a society the woman everywhere aspires to license and tries to not obey the husband or the chief and strives to affect him, to subordinate to herself. She also reaches it different dodges, flattery, softness, charm, and then starts to dictate and boss. It is difficult to list those numerous means, which the woman has to conquer the husband and contrary to all to begin in the head of family, not thinking about what thin consequences for her and for her children are in this her behaviour. The woman is the slave and the woman is the head. These both positions are abnormal. Where the true men have got to? Pushkin was just when spoke: «To be it is possible the efficient person and to think about beauty of nails».

The world has turned over, values fall. During a history much that has collapsed. The problem of our modern spiritual life is not in that even further to break off up to depth all our atheistic dustbins – to it and the end will not be, and is in that to find a true way to that to understand, to feel divine beauty and a miracle of love. And, when the person sees this greatness, fascinating spirit beauty - he is made more silently and is more restrained. I remember one girl who before a marriage has told: know, since I see, that I am loved, at me trembling and humility in soul because love - such relic, that I know, I want to be worthy this miracle of love … where humility begins. Then we are made not fine, we grow in enormous, majestic growth. And what pleasure to be loved not on merits, and that you such on light to eat and be proud of the position in a society only because you we like.

One more tendency of a modern society is incomplete families. Women speak about men, he has betraid, and men about himself - I has stopped loving. In love there is a treachery. In a marriage there is a choice. Here all in an adult way: the husband should be devoted to the unique woman who protects his rear and allows the husband to shine in a society. Human advantage should have and women and men. It is necessary to concern to the person with the deepest respect. I do not speak with mercy or with pity. It is possible to be merciful and compassionate, but concerns to the person with contempt. It is necessary to concern to each person how the God concerns to each of us. For him each of us is the only thing and it gives infinite value to the person. About what we spoke it during lives, but love there is a vital value. And for the sake of it each of us needs to cross sometimes through itself to maintain normal, kind human relations with unworthy people. In the best way of reception desirable in a life is nothing to wait. And then it will necessarily come. We should be oneself in the most absolute, boundless sense of this word. But ourselves we can be, only if shall join source of a life which enables the person to combine softness, love, enormous force and opportunity to be given love, to service of all life.

Advice to you yes Love …. It is married the God’s Bondman to God’s Bondmaid...

He is done by the prince crowned by tsar because she loves him and on the contrary. In what business: anticipating and changing love … And when you are gifted with such love, remains nothing to other half how to answer mutually this miracle and to begin liked.

Whether the atomic power station is necessary for Belarus?

Egor FEDJUSHIN

Recently the Security Council of Belarus has made the final decision on construction of the atomic power station. We shall leave this decision on its conscience. I am confident, that sooner or later this decision will be recognized erroneous, and there will be those extreme on who will fall down the responsibility. And can, and will not be. All will be written off on collective irresponsibility as it at us not time happened in the past. We try to forget and Afghanistan, and Chernobyl, and many other things on what clever people should study. But our management, referring to imaginary cheapness and safety that is why and without alternative award of nuclear power, has chosen not the best variant of maintenance of national safety of the country. Now of mass-media of Belarus have already started massed processing public opinion, trying to convince us in brilliant prospects of a nuclear way of the development. As the physicist - nuclear engineering, 35 years, given out to nuclear power, I should see that global problem already existing as result of huge moral (psychological) damage, put to the population of our country Chernobyl failure about which recently completely ignore. Besides it is necessary to take into account and many physiological factors, and, in particular, that Belarus in a sad rating on a cancer of a stomach stands on the second place after Japan among 111 countries of the world. And in fact even these two already existing aspects carry in themselves huge danger to the future of our nation for as independent physicians ascertain, there were negative genic changes in organisms of our children which will be kept in the subsequent generations. Therefore, it seems to me what even to bring an attention to the question on construction of the atomic power station in Belarus, at least, is immoral. I remember, 18 years ago I have written article «Radiation against metal or how to provide safety of the atomic power station». Then we were in structure of the USSR and, naturally, in article the prospect of development of nuclear and thermonuclear power in the Soviet Union in a context of world tendencies existing at that time was considered. Article in the beginning has been published in the academic newspaper, whether and then has been reprinted in some other newspapers under the name «Is there a future at the atomic power station?». I shall result some fragments from that article: «… Manufacture and consumption of fuel and energy in our country is at a level of the most advanced countries (7,5 tons of conditional fuel one year per capita - hardly less, than in the USA and hardly are more, than in Europe). But, despite of it, the standard of well-being of our people is many times lower, than in these countries. Therefore it is completely clear, that the exit will consist of crisis not in the further escalating manufacture of energy. Priorities will be given to the nearest years to other problems: resource economy, modernizations and rationalization of manufacture, economy of energy …. The large atomic engineering cannot develop further only on the basis of modern nuclear-power concepts which base are light-water reactors. New concepts are required, - as on reactors and the atomic power station as a whole, and on a fuel cycle and under the manipulation with radioactive waste products, - simultaneously providing radical increase of nuclear safety, improvement of fuel balance …». Article has been written 18 years ago, but what has changed since then? In nuclear power it is almost anything. But for this time the world science has opened new opportunities for development of power. And my final conclusion in article, that all to give up as a bad job the future of the atomic power station still is premature, has been applicable to those conditions when we were in structure of the USSR. Now it is fair as applied only to those countries, at which economy is guided by nuclear power. For Belarus it is nonsense. It is unreasonable to begin such doubtful project - «expensive long-term construction». I could not think at that time at all, that after disintegration of the USSR, someone can seriously suggest to build the atomic power station in territory of Belarus. And have suggested. Also it has already decided. But let's think before, whether so this construction is necessary. The program of construction of the atomic power station in Belarus will swallow up billions dollars and, most likely, will not be executed, and the nuclear lobby will blackmail subsequently the government with an opportunity of failures and to demand new investments. And all this due to the distressful Belarusian people till now experiencing Chernobyl. The mythical economic gain from construction of the atomic power station will soon dissipate at specification of calculations and the account of all expenses. To speak about increase of military safety too, at least, is strange. In the beginning of this year the London newspaper in Arabian language "Al-Hajat" has published interview to head of the IAEA which has declared, that terrorists can make attempt to blow up a nuclear reactor or a warehouse with radioactive materials in a megapolis. The quantity of victims of such act of terrorism can be estimated hundreds thousand person, and its consequences can eclipse acts of terrorism on September, 11. It is known, that the similar plan is born with tens various terrorist groupings. And every day danger of grows that they will manage to carry out the plan. It turns out what completely to secure the atomic power station against terrorism or a military attack hardly it will be possible. As to power independence here again to any person it is clear, that nuclear dependence is much more serious hydrocarbonic. Not casually dynamics of development of nuclear power for last 20 years is much lower, than use of other energy sources. And this tendency will proceed. Already now industrially advanced countries at home have practically stopped construction of the new atomic power stations. Continue them to build only those countries which create nuclear arsenals (China, South Korea, India and Pakistan). But … it is their problems. We were vainly hooked for old, becoming obsolete nuclear technology of the middle of the last century. It does not promise to us any prospects of development. Having started construction of the atomic power station, we shall waste time, and time is an opportunity of a choice. Hasty accepted decision means, that the opportunity of a choice at us any more will not be. And we exhaust ourselves in impasse. Belarus is all the unique country on many parameters. For example, whenever possible developments of small power, by amount of fresh water which already becomes a strategic resource, etc. And it should be used. In present critical conditions when there are no investments and power resources, it would be necessary for our economists to define economic - forming priority branch which development will pull behind itself all other branches of economy. Such theory of economic ramming has justified itself in Japan, South Korea, Malaysia. For example, in conditions of shortage of natural resources and energy carriers the economy of Japan is based basically on two high technology branches: microelectronics and small-displacement motor industry. In my opinion, in conditions of stagnation of nuclear power nuclear corporations want to export to us (and not only to us) nuclear technologies which in the West are not in demand. From all basic kinds of energy the nuclear power is the most expensive and in addition to this the enormous damage and causes to the nature and a society. It survives only there where huge grants are paid and where it protect from a healthy competition. It absorbs means which could be invested in more comprehensible alternative sources. It seems to me, all of us should reflect also above the recent message on that, company MidAmerican Nuclear Energy has declared refusal of construction of the atomic power station in county Paiet, state Idaho, the USA. «Strict expert examination has led us to a conclusion what now to develop the project has no any economic sense», - is spoken in the statement of campaign on an official site. One of owners MidAmerican Nuclear Energy is Warren Buffet - the most well-known investor of the present entering on a rating of magazine Forbes in the five of the richest people the USA (the capital $36 billion). «If Buffet cannot think up how to earn at nuclear station, then to whom it in general under force? », - Michael Mariotte, director of Information and resource service on a nuclear energy (Nuclear Information and Resource Service, NIRS) makes comments. Under information NIRS of the price for construction of nuclear reactors for last 2-3 years have flied up on 300-400 %. It is considered, that high cost and unresolved problems in the field of safety and recycling of radioactive waste products have stopped development of atomic engineering in the USA where after 1978 it has not been made any order for construction of a nuclear reactor. In my opinion, today in Belarus are absent economic, social and specifications for development of atomic engineering. In this connection, to our government and the National academy of sciences for only from its submission such decision could be accepted, it is necessary to reconsider the relation to atomic engineering as to inevitable necessity, having initiated carrying out of researches in the field of use of alternative energy sources. We should take into account the world tendency to ecological cleanliness of our man-caused civilizations. Now all over the world splash in interest to use of renewed power resources by virtue of their ecological cleanliness, an opportunity of replacement by them the exhaustible organic fuel and an opportunity of their application in independent energy sources are observed. And this tendency will amplify every year. Wind, solar and especially geothermal power win the increasing densities in a power balance of many countries. By then, when the Belarusian atomic power station will start though in part to compensate the spent enormous means alternative to technology which rate of development is incomparably higher than rates of development of the atomic power station, will take an outstanding place in power of the advanced countries. And we again should catch up. With scientific and from the practical point of view it is more expedient to put means in more perspective directions in power, with a sight not on the past, and on the future. In my opinion, many opening already have now appeared, capable radically to change concepts about bases of construction of a matter, forms of its interaction and display. Hence, there are many new ways of reception of the energy latent from us from surrounding space. The certificate to that - known works of Akimov and Shipov, theoretical and technological developments of Leonov and Dudyshev, Potapov and Gritskevich and other researchers who realize modern scientific achievements from area of hydrodynamics, flow dynamics, magnetodynamics, physics of vacuum, etc. And behind them is the future. It is and not so remote. Belarus in these conditions could force development of small power and development of perspective technologies, not dependent on presence of natural power resources. In fact hundreds unfuel power plants of this direction already successfully work, proving a reality of existence of new power. For example, manufacture of electric energy by Vladimir Leonov's quantum engine-generators with capacity of 100 kw allows to reduce tariffs for the electric power in 2,8 times, and quantum heat-generators are capable to reduce tariffs for heat in 8 times. Thus it is not required neither chemical, nor nuclear fuel. On a crest of a wave on development of such technologies we could develop the national science and strengthen scientific and technical potential of the country. On this way of us new achievements, opening and patents which, by the way, could be sold to other countries could expect. I hope, you agree with me, that it will be more reasonable to spend the nearest years some tens millions dollars for creation of expert-test institute which would engage in introduction of these technologies in our energy, than senselessly to spend them for construction of the atomic power station. Certainly, political support of power structures is necessary for realization of new technologies and, first of all, old academic elite. Financial structures and business in conditions of inefficient economy as a whole are not interested in innovative activity. The serious legislative base stimulating the investments into new technologies without which structural reorganization of our out-of-date economic model is impossible is necessary, certainly, it is necessary to work at this direction much. But it will be the fruitful work directed on development of own economy. And, having undertaken for nuclear adventure, we shall be compelled, as they say, «to work on the uncle», to support a high level of the nuclear industry of the state - the supplier of the atomic power station, and at myself to leave in the inheritance to our children and grandsons a heap of problems. It is necessary to agree with the statement of a management of the country, that «today the science is an integral part of industrial potential of the country, base of its innovative development. Researches of domestic scientists in many respects define the future of our state, dynamics of growth of well-being of its citizens». However, even the fluent analysis of a modern condition of an official science in Belarus, fundamental and branch, in view of last decision on construction of the atomic power station (in fact it was based on recommendations of the NSA RB) allows to conclude, that this major component of our society, having got confused in attempts to solve momentary tasks of applied character, is doomed for pity existence. I think that, sooner or later, the life will force us to proceed to new, non-polluting and independent energy sources.

The step forward, two steps back

Virginia HMELJAUSKAJTE (Lithuania, Vilnius) Competition

Hello, dear readers! I many thanks to you for support of me in competition, for your warm words and critical remarks in letters. I am glad, that the questions put by me have not left you indifferent and you vividly responded to all useful, that has been written in my articles. It is very pleasant for me to see and that my work has not gone to waste and in my favourite Internet-newspaper Belaruskaja Krynitsa there are all new and new authors representing already the vision of those questions who for the first time have been lifted in my articles. I want to note once again, that questions of relations between the man and the woman, questions of creation of high-grade family and mutual relations in family, questions of education of young generation are very important both for each of us, and for a society as a whole. All this fills our life and defines a level of our today's life and our future. In 1991 Belarus began on a new independent way of the development. It was very important and responsible step in a life of Belarusian people. It was a step forward in the statehood and economic development. I remember 1992 when I was in Minsk as the participant of the international conference, and we were together pleased to that occurrence of the first rudiments of freedom in our post Soviet republics. Lithuania, one from the first republics, escaped of a captivity of Bolshevistic concentration camp, has quickly found a correct way of the development. Though many public processes, occurring now in Lithuania, cause still some alarm and afflictions. In Ukraine some oligarchical clans, having crushed practically all existing political parties, are engaged in infinite cheap politics and a sharing of authority. Belarus after input в1994 to year of presidential board in general began to live by a known principle «better a titmouse in hands, than a crane in the sky» and has decided to keep completely former Soviet orders at full authoritative board. But the processes, occurring in a society, cannot wait for instructions from above; they continuously proceed under the laws and can lead to the significant negative phenomena. Therefore absence of the state ideology and concrete conceptual approaches to all mutual relations in the state which allow to adjust and to operate development of a society as a whole is pernicious for this society. Today in Belarus legal system of regulation of family relations and understanding of family as cells of a society I fully comply with Soviet times. Only earlier they were still supported with moral-ethical standards of communistic ideology. Now after crash of this ideology on a place of these norms there came moral standards of wild capitalism. The authority wants it or does not want; the family in Belarus from a cell of a society gradually turns to the certain primitive economic structure created for satisfaction of only sexual needs. The concept of love between the man and the woman gradually degrades and in mass media with concept sex already is completely replaced. And sex, appears, can be and unisex. The Belarusian authorities need to be engaged urgently not only economic problems and spirituality. Revival of spiritual national traditions, and is even better, full National Revival - the most important problem which should face to the Belarus society if it wants to exist in a world history. It is necessary to reject categorically both any displays of immorality of the modern validity, and antihuman ideology of Soviet atheistic time. That is to make two steps back in your ideological history, and completely to return to moral norms of Christianity, which long years dominated over the Belarusian society before October revolution. Acceptance of the state ideology based on norms of Christianity, will promote gradual improvement of a society. In a society the values corresponding to the civilized state become determining. And the most important to change the person - from the consumer becomes the creator according to the divine plan. The number of the negative phenomena generated both long-term domination of the Bolshevism, and wild capitalism will considerably decrease. And in this updated society the family should play a predominating role. Interests of family and each person separately should define all activity and a policy of the state. I already feel, that you, dear readers, smile and think: this Virginia is true visionary! It is good to live supposedly in one country and to dream about other country. I to you shall tell, my dear, that somewhere twenty years ago those people which spoke about independence of Lithuania, too named visionaries. And nevertheless in fact it was carried out! Whether and in Belarus somebody at that time could tell, what Soviet Union will collapsed? No, could not … him at once in a madhouse would send. And I speak about real things. And on you depend - there can be it whether or not. Up to new meetings, my dear readers!